Research & Evaluation - NNPHIFrom collaboration on program design to translating, publishing, and sharing research and evaluation findings, NNPHI and its members are involved in all aspects of research projects and program monitoring and evaluation. Collectively, the work of our member institutes and on- site staff supports program development, continuous quality improvement, and accountability. Our Work. As a national network, we are committed to producing, translating, and sharing research and evaluation findings with heady implications for improvements in policies, practices, programs, and. As part of an expansive network of experts, NNPHI staff and member institutes have extensive experience with implementing program monitoring and evaluation systems for a wide variety of public health programs, across a variety of public health topics at the local, state, and national levels. Our areas of expertise include: Behavioral health. Monitoring and Evaluation of Public Health Programs: Systems Approaches and Techniques M. Savoia (Harvard School of Public Health) Where: Castello Brandolini Colomban, Cison di Valmarino - Treviso - Italy When: June. Public Health Programs Evaluation ModelsBridging public health and health care. Built environment and urban planning. Chronic disease. Community assessment / improvement planning. Public Health Programs Evaluation ModelOverview 'Evaluating a Public Health Program' is the last in a series of trainings dealing with the development and evaluation of public health programs. This training serves as a comprehensive tutorial on the Evaluation of a. An Evaluation Framework for Community Health Programs June 2000 The Center for the Advancement of Community Based Public Health 5102 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Durham, North Carolina 27707. Introducing the first Master of Health Evaluation (MHE) professional. Evaluation is essential to the practice of public health. Professional programs. Master of Health Evaluation. Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. Cross- jurisdictional sharing / collaboration. Food safety. Health disparities / Health equity. Health in all policies. Health information technology / Health informatics. Healthy eating / Active living. Maternal and child health. Obesity prevention. Performance management and quality improvement. School health. Tobacco- free living. Learn more about NNPHI. We also draw on staff and member institute expertise in epidemiology, biostatistics, econometrics, policy analysis, and comparative effectiveness research. Our core capabilities include: Data cleaning, validation, missing- data imputation. Data visualization including geographic information system (GIS)Database management. Descriptive analysis, bivariate, and multivariate analysis, modeling, and hypothesis testing and inference. Development of evaluation plans and logic models. Development of inductive and deductive codebooks and thematic coding. Environmental scans. Grounded theory approaches. Meta- analysis and systematic literature reviews. Propensity score matching. Qualitative data collection through case studies, focus groups, and in- depth interviews. Research and evaluation methodology and design. Social network analysis. Survey methods including instrument design and testing, sampling, and fielding. Contact Us. For more information, please contact our in- house Research and Evaluation Team at evaluation@nnphi. Public Health Program Evaluation: What is it? Program evaluation provides an opportunity to gain insight into whether activities are achieving their desired results, improve program services and disseminate information to others regarding program success. Were there unintended consequences of the program? Program evaluation can be done at different points during the life of a program: Needs assessment- before a program begins to determine the need of the program and how it could be addressed Process evaluation- during the initial stages of implementation to see if the program is being carried out as planned Outcome evaluation - as the program matures to see if its objectives are being met Impact evaluation - at full maturation to determine what expected or unforeseen impacts the program had Myth #1 : Evaluation is only about determining the success or failure of a program. This reaction stems from the idea that programs are static and that the ideal program will run itself . Myth # 3: Program evaluation is done in a certain time in a certain way and collects tedious data with useless conclusions. An evaluation is systematic and tailored to the unique elements of a program.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |